Quote: <div>
I have no idea.  I'm not a scout.

 

But, based on what I personally see... I think taking any of these QBs at three presents more risk than reward.  I don't see any being top 10 material.

 

If anyone were stupid enough to let Clowney or Matthews fall and he's tops on your board... you have to take them.

 

On the other hand, I could understand if they'd take a shot with Manziel.  I wouldn't agree with taking him that high, but I'd understand why they took the risk.  I think Bortles is the safest of the three but no way would I imagine he goes that high.  If Teddy drops I believe that's a huge "stay away" signal, because I believe (as I always have) that it's my suspicion the scouts opinion of him isn't nearly as high as some of the early fanboys and draftnicks are (or at least were.)

 

I could more easily see someone like McCarron with our second round pick, plus someone like Logan Thomas with our fifth or sixth.  I wouldn't have a problem with that at all.

 

No matter what QB we pick or when (even if it's Manziel in the first), I'm afraid we'll be taking another QB in the first round in the next three years.  Some are dead set the savior is here.  I'm highly suspicious.  Like when we took Leftwich, if we're facing another Roethlisberger next year... you pull the trigger again.  You can't be too sure at QB.  That was our problem in the past.  We settled and quit drafting.