(08-07-2018, 03:58 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(08-07-2018, 03:39 PM)mikesez Wrote: Its just like the question, why does Colbert get to make fun of O'Reilly but O'Reilly doesn't get to make fun of Colbert?
Both are nothing more than entertainment with tiny chunks of real news, presented out of context and without rebuttal, in the gruel.
But one has openly presented himself as a satirical entertainer.
The other has presented himself as a serious source of news and opinions.
If you think what Candace Owens does is fun or entertaining, more power to you.  Like what you like.  lf you think she sees her video persona as a fair judge, and if you think she'd actually continue to stand up for whatever she's squaking about today when the Piper changes his tune, or if the subpoenas start coming in, joke's on you.

No matter what your opinion of Candice Owens is, it doesn't give anyone a right to harass her. Did you see republicans doing this at any time during the Obama regime?

I agree that no one has a right to harass her.
You're saying that people on the right never went out and harassed whatever the left wing version of Candace Owens is.  But who is the left wing version of Candace Owens?  Jon Stewart and Bill Maher are both clearly going for humor, and Maher attacks the left as well as the right at times.  Goldberg isn't usually trying to be funny, but The View is not a monologue the way what Owens or Tomi Lahren do is a monologue.

---