(08-07-2018, 09:05 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:

(08-07-2018, 08:15 PM)mikesez Wrote: There are a lot of reasons why you're wrong.
But this is a personal topic and I'm a man. I come across as enough of a know-it-all without attempting to explain something I'll probably never experience to another person who is probably a man and also probably will never experience it.
in my opinion people like Candace Owens want to be in the news for pissing liberals off. their target audience often has the thought process of "I don't know if they are right or wrong but they're pissing the right people off." Candace Owens gets a clear benefit from being in the news this way.
On the other hand, when a man says, "she was asking for it," in a sexual assualt context, it usually doesn't make any sense.  What does the woman gain by "asking for it" sexually and then denying that consent was offered later?

I am not familiar with Candace Owens other than what I've read recently, but I doubt she wanted to be attacked like she was. I see you are still using the "she asked for it" rationalization.

Can you at least admit that the physical and verbal confrontations of politically-oriented people going about their daily business is predominantly (overwhelmingly) a Left attacking Right phenomenon?