Login

MalabarJag · 08-26-2018, 02:05 PM

(08-26-2018, 01:26 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 05:46 PM)B2hibry Wrote: Yes, they did in fact deny it existed. They bashed Trump and GOP for even suggesting such a thing. I’m sure we all remember the last POTUS actually encouraging voter fraud in his TV interview. Until now, fraud was not being investigated on a larger scale, which is the reason for low numbers. The immediate destruction or lack of hard evidence is another. A proper system of accountability may be in order but there goes the Dems plausible deniability.

I’m curious to see what kind of pushback arises when the topic of mandatory voter IDs comes up again. Seems between all this fraud and collusion it would be the perfect “comprehensive” solution.

The President was bashed for suggesting that voter fraud had a significant effect. It didn't, and he should be smart enough to know that.

I don't know what you mean by "mandatory voter ID." Isn't that what Florida has had for about 20 years now?

You can't say "it didn't" anymore than Trump could say it did. There isn't enough accounting to know how many people voted illegally. That's especially true in California, where well over 3 million foreign nationals have drivers licences and thus could also have slipped past the registration system. 19 people were caught, but "caught" is usually a small percentage of the total of any crime. And North Carolina has probably fewer foreign nationals than average.

So yeah, voted fraud could be a problem, and there could have been 3 million illegal votes cast in California. It's much likely a lot less, but not an insignificant number. We can't know for sure unless there are stronger safeguards in place. You clearly are one of the Leftists who opposes such safeguards.

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"