Quote:No, I'm not questioning his work ethic at all. But just because you have talent and a good work ethic doesn't mean you'll evolve and be productive. Look at Blaine Gabbert. If you want to look at a receiver with equal or more talent and equal or more work ethic, look at Ted Ginn.


I'm really not making this out to be a big problem, I'm just saying its a question mark going into the process and it's the reason he's not an elite level prospect some are saying that he is. I wouldn't take him at #3 with that large of a question mark on him. First round? Definitely on talent alone.

I think the QB position is different, but yes you are right, I personally wouldn't take him at three. Not so much because I don't think he won't be an impact player, but because of talent at other positions added with the amount of holes that we have on our team.


Now would it make more sense for a team like Oakland, or St. Louis, or even Cleveland... Pending on which QB is available.. I would make that argument. But makes no sense for a team as as bad as us to pick a wr at three with the talent at QB and Leo available.

---