Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Packers/Rodgers Agree to Big$$ Extension

#18

(08-31-2018, 08:12 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2018, 08:05 PM)Upper Wrote: He said Bortles vs Rodgers was "team vs no team". You are saying rookie QB vs Rodgers. We'll be able to keep our young stars either way. We might not be filling them in with as good of players compared to a rookie deal QB, or we would be filling them in with almost exactly as good of players if we still have Bortles. Either way, having one of the most elite QBs in the game is better than unproven rookie + 3 good players or average QB + one good player.

I interpreted it as:  rather having Bortles and a good team around him (including a sustainable championship defense) - opposed to over-investing/committing to Rodgers but giving up that sustainability. 

Rodgers' deal would dismantle the Jags defense in 2020 and that is why I'd take Bortles right now over Rodgers at that $99 million price. This defense gives us a chance to win with a mid-tier quarterback. I'm all about keeping that kind of defense in place as long as possible.

Not that I disagree but playing devil's advocate, isn't there a compelling argument that defense can win a championship but a top 3 qb can win you multiple championships.

Last year was amazing it's a blast having a big nasty defense! But in the grand scheme keeping the gang together and paid is a tall order. What if Ramsey doesn't want to stay in Jax and chases the bigger market? What if we let Fowler walk and then Yannick gets hurt? What if Bryan isn't the replacement for Campbell and he leaves a massive void in our dline at retirement? One or two moving pieces is out of place and that big nasty defense has some glarring weaknesses. As to where a top tier QB can solve an average defenses by scoring on demand, makes average WR better, gets ride of the ball fast enough you don't need the wall of China for an oline. It's how the Patriots have done it for a decade, it's how the clots did it, for every defense that wins a championship there's 3 teams that did it with elite QB play. Now the 100 million dollar question is Rogers that QB?
[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Packers/Rodgers Agree to Big$$ Extension - by EricC85 - 08-31-2018, 08:57 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!