Login

~~Krayz_Jville_D~~ · 09-14-2018, 03:21 PM

(09-14-2018, 02:31 PM)Kane Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 02:02 PM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: ^

putting some other guy in another guy's place does not mean they automatically play like them, sorry, doesnt work that way

abry and ankou will not be ready next year to replace dareus because neither of those guys are as good as dareus at what he does, and they wont be next year either

taven bryan is not going to replace campbell miraculously in year 2 just because he isnt a rookie anymore... Taven Bryan is not calais campbell

the list goes on, until those guys show they are as good as the guys they are replacing, it is a DOWNGRADE

why do we need to cut campbell and or jackson next year when ramsey, jack, and yannick are all still on their rookie deals? why?

This is so funny and typical the sky is falling type stuff.
Everyone gets replaced. And all-pros game falls off. Also, no one is saying Taven steps in and becomes Campbell. That's why we hope our coach staff develops these kids.
This just in: those guys wont really show their stuff until they see the field. Some of which will happen this year.
If you guys think we're making it through next offseason without cutting someone you like that is very talented.... whoo, get the tissues ready.
We may not HAVE to get rid of any of them... but I'm thinking some moves are gonna be made before we HAVE to in order to manipulate the cap and stagger the deals out.

Will we take a step back at some positions? Probably. Is that the price we may have to pay in order to keep some other guys? Probably.

C'est la vie

no this is not sky is falling, but it isnt teal colored glasses saying oh next man up and we wont miss a beat!!

and yes, you guys are talking about replacing guys when we dont have too. Not one time in your posts are people saying we will only need to replace them if they fall off a cliff, you guys are discussing it like its a forgone logical conclusion that they will be cut next year

again, our 3 young studs are in year 3 of a 4 year rookie deal ( I believe its 4 years )... meaning we dont need to cut anyone next year. If we need to make cuts to fit the current team under, there are far more candidates I would go too way before our best players. Marquise Lee is an easy one... we have Moncrief freeing up 10 mill next year, I would cut Parnell ages before jackson or campbell. I dont want to move on from Church yet if he continues playing well, but I would move on from him before Jackson or Campbell or Dareus..

and again this is of course assuming those 3 dlineman have good seasons again, which after what I saw in game 1, I dont see that being an issue.

It's almost comical how logic goes out the window with this fanbase some times.. It was gone when we stunk, and somehow, it's still absent even when we are good.

After NEXT season, then you can choose to let Jackson go in FA if we want, then we can talk about cutting Campbell as he will be in the 4th year of his deal and probably in steep decline at that point, and you can evaluate Dareus as well.

But this season and next season we do NOT have nor need to cut either of those 3