(09-28-2018, 12:15 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(09-27-2018, 10:44 PM)Upper Wrote: Man it's not even close to that much either. The difference between Blake and Cousins contracts the next two years is 8 million a year. That's literally only losing Moncrief and Hayden.

LOL

So dumb. 
It's not that simple. You love to leave out that Cousins has 60 million more in guaranteed money than Blake. Not the first time you've been called on it either.

It was a 3 year deal fully guaranteed for Cousins, not some 6-7 year monstrosity. There is zero chance we're cutting Blake next year and eating 16.5 mil dead cap. So the only scenario in which guaranteed money matters is if Blake is so bad that we want to cut him in year 3. And obviously if Blake is so bad that he's nuked 2 seasons of prime championship window and we want to cut him in year 3 and start over with a new QB then the whole debate is DOA.

I would throw in a condescending LOL or LMAO and call you so dumb for arguing that the ability to cut a QB if he's so bad that he single handedly derailed a championship window can be construed as a win, but that's not my style. On the flip side, when the point you're trying to support is that pathetic I can see the rationale for going with the ad hominem. I wouldn't want to try to defend it on its merits either.

---