(10-07-2018, 07:16 PM)Upper Wrote:

(10-07-2018, 07:12 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Already hashed this out months ago. It's not a myth. You just kept leaving the gaping difference in guaranteed money out to suit your narrative. 

It's a shame i'm even bothering to explain it to some moron that only shows up here to whine and moan after losses, much less doing it again for you.

Nope, we actually just did again it like last week in the other forum. You trying to turn a 3 (three) year fully guaranteed deal out to be some 6-7 year monstrosity is the problem. Cousins' deal is barely more prohibitive than Bortles' is for keeping a defense together, and his talent is several tiers better.

I get that it is easier to brush a bad FO decision under the rug by trying to make Cousins deal sound like some boogey monster that it really isn't, but the problem is that it's not the truth.

LOL

The truth??  It's simple freakin math. You keep trying to twist this [BLEEP].  Blake's contract is $57.5 million dollars less in guaranteed money.  You can't keep sweeping that under the rug. He also has an out after 2019 that will let them start a young QB in 2020 on a cheap rookie deal. 

In comparison - Cousins' salary in 2020 is 31 million - in a year when Ramsey and Ngakoue are due.  

You can try to spin this crap all night, but it's stupid. And I didn't even hate the idea of Cousins in teal, I just understand why they didn't do it.

---