(10-09-2018, 01:22 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(10-09-2018, 12:38 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Yep that cost the Jags big time trying to run way too many deep passes to Moncrief. That should be removed from the playbook. He sucks at catching the ball and the plays take way too long. Use Chark, Cole, etc on those passes and the results will be better.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

Moncrief's ability to get after the ball in those situations has been disappointing, but let's not pretend Blake has been giving him much of a chance on many of them. 

Here are four craptastic misses from Blake to #10 from the chefs game:



That said -  I'm actually in agreement with the prior suggestion that Chark begin taking some of Moncrief's snaps. 
If for no other reason than his apparent ability to track the ball - which may allow him to adjust his route on bad passes on those days when Bad Blake shows up.  Though none of the passes above were salvageable - maybe Chark can salvage more than Moncrief has on those that aren't totally uncatchable.

If you look at those 4 plays, the one in the dirt was bad. The 2 overthrows i would not consider bad, every time the defneder grabeed and held Moncrief and he slowed down(terrible effort) Chark might have gotten to them.  The one thing RBB5 does well is timing with his deep passes. The last one is either a incredibly bad throw, or on the play it looks like moncrief faked inside and then turn out, he hit the db and then stopped and blake had already throw the ball out.

I personally think that some of it is on blake but alot is on moncrief being lazy. I would rather see chark out there the more time he gets the better he will get.

Of course i could be wrong and moncrief is an elite WR

---