(10-12-2018, 03:25 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:

(10-12-2018, 03:08 PM)iHaunting Raven Wrote: You aren't winning here buddy. Why should I answer to you? I know what kind of person you are.

The fact is, it was stupid to sign Flowers, period.

If you don't have a better alternative, then your argument is wrong. As horrible as Flowers is, he may legitimately be the best tackle on the market. So, unless you have a better option, then you're not making a point.

The thing many are pointing out. Most of us feel they are over valuing "experience against NFL quality DE's" in the assessment of best on the market. Over past few years the biggest thing we always hear is how OT don't get enough reps unless they are with the Number 1 team, so that might be what they are basing this on.

So for a "break glass for emergency" starter, they think Flowers is better than getting a young guy from some other team's practice squad. I get that working in a young guy onto the team in season is not great, but the tape on Flowers shows many mistakes and flaws that you would probably see in many players who don't have that experience either.

Maybe it is because it is at the end of the week and Wells trended down instead of up, and they will do a more thorough search next week?

---