(10-22-2018, 11:46 PM)iHaunting Raven Wrote:

(10-07-2018, 11:19 PM)Eye of the Storm Wrote: It’s not even worth responding to you anymore because outside of spacecoast you’re the biggest Bortles apologist on the board. Facts don’t matter to you because you’re just going to see things the way you want to, and that’s fine. But I’ve been watching football for about 40 years and I know a bad quarterback when I see one and Bortles is a bad quarterback. I’ll root for this team for as long as we have them, but you’ll never convince me that we are going to win a championship with Blake as the quarterback. Have a good night sir.

(10-22-2018, 09:51 PM)old_man Wrote: Kessler sucks....He had a strip sack and interception in less than a half.

My eyes tell me Kessler is horrible.

And still did better than Bortles.

Not really though.
He dinked and dunked to a high comp % and a very low YPA
Got a single TD in what really amounted to garbage time.

Not saying Bortles was good. But to think Kessler came in a made a difference is silly.
Houston was protecting their insurmountable 20 point lead with a lot of off zone coverage and giving us every 3 yard pass we wanted.

---

(10-22-2018, 04:26 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote:

(10-16-2018, 09:57 AM)FBT Wrote: There's a possibility that unicorns exist too.  

It's okay to accept the reality that Kessler is in the position he is because he's just not a starter, and the only opportunity he'll get to take snaps in a game that matters is if Bortles is incapacitated.  He's not going to get a whiff of the field if Bortles is healthy.

You were saying?  Wrong again as usual.

Haha... I guess technically he was wrong.

But Bortles is starting again... so... yeah.

---