(11-25-2018, 07:48 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(11-25-2018, 06:07 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: 9-7. maybe 10-6 with a full roster.

So our defense gets worse next year, we can’t sign someone in the off-season because we have no money and yet we go 10-6 with Blake?

Hilarious.

So you were saying in the preseason that this team was going to be bad? Because next year's team is going to be very much the same team minus 1 or 2 guys. Or are you in the "we have to move on from everybody with a contract this off-season" camp? Either way, the expectations for next season aren't going to be all that different. Look, I get it, it's been a miserable year. But this team wasn't put together with a 2 year window and all the overreaction around here doesn't change that.

---

(11-25-2018, 09:03 PM)jon2005 Wrote:

(11-25-2018, 06:07 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: 9-7. maybe 10-6 with a full roster.

Why do people after five years of Bortles, does hope spring eternal that somehow some magical football QB fairy dust will sprinkle down from the football heavens over Bortles and he will become even just a serviceable QB? Do you have QB Stockholm Syndrome? He's bad....face it, he's bad. Get over it. Time to move on. I said it weeks ago after the Chiefs game, 3 and 13. 

Why oh why did they choose a QB in the draft that ran primarily the option in college? [BLEEP]?

I know, I know, NFL fandom is the place of heroism in dissing the home team and very short memories of success. Such is life.

---

(11-25-2018, 07:48 PM)Setsuna00 Wrote: This QB class is the weakest since 2013. The year of Geno Smith, Matt Barkley, and EJ Manuel to name a few. Pass on QB in 2019.

(11-25-2018, 07:48 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: So our defense gets worse next year, we can’t sign someone in the off-season because we have no money and yet we go 10-6 with Blake?

Hilarious.

I have that dude on ignore. I'd rather not see his posts being quoted because then I see them.

Lol, poor baby. Not unexpected, but certainly sad nonetheless.

---