(11-29-2018, 11:05 AM)old_man Wrote: I do not think he is taking it personally.  it is just in response to your comment:

"There is simply no chance Bortles is on our roster next year."

Because how are you going to justify paying him 21 million dollars next year to either be your starter (hahahaha) or a backup?

---

(11-29-2018, 11:09 AM)Jay Carter 904 Wrote:

(11-29-2018, 10:54 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: A vet will be signed whether it is a "Flacco" type or maybe even Bridgewater (he is a vet by now, right?)

There is simply no chance Bortles is on our roster next year.

(11-29-2018, 10:55 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: He's done man. You have to face it. How can you bench Blake for Cody Kessler and then start out next year saying Blake gives you the best chance to win? It won't happen. Unless Kessler gets hurt, Blake has thrown his last (off target, duck wobble) pass as a Jag.

They are going to cut Blake. Eat the dead money. Start Kessler (if he plays well) or start the young QB and hope you can surround the young guy with a solid running game and defense until they can be the leader.

(11-29-2018, 11:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: It's called a difference of opinion.

I'm just looking at all the facts and coming up with my own thoughts. Just like you are when you say he will be back next year.

---

If he's on the team next year, he will cost 21 million dollars. Name me 1 21 million dollar backup?

(11-29-2018, 11:03 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: You are taking Bortles' lack of talent personally. It's just a message board discussion.

I bold and underlined your absolute statements.

Why would I personally invest in someone I don't know? I just use common sense and logic. Emotional Bortles haters is the only thing I see here.

I don't hate Blake at all. I just think he's a bad QB and his play certainly proves that.

I also see that they most likely don't want to pay him 21 million dollars next season to be the starter or backup. Can you really trot him out as the starter next year?

---