Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump to rewrite Constitution with executive order

#84

(12-07-2018, 09:40 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(12-07-2018, 09:16 PM)mikesez Wrote: Kavanaugh worked in a political role for Bush 43.
a colleague approached him with documents that had been clearly stolen off of Democratic senators' computers.
He should have reported the theft to the FBI.
Instead he not only kept the theft secret but gave the stolen info to his friends.
And he has never admitted his role nor apologized.
Read the same story back and change the name Kavanaugh to Kagan, Bush to Clinton, and Democratic to Republican.
Think about how you would feel.
Kavanaugh should never have been given the opportunity to work as a federal judge.

He never saw the memos, just the information.

The suspicion is that he should've known it was stolen due to the extensive detail of the provided information. He claimed that he believed it was gathered from people on the opposing side that offered it to the person showing him. There was nothing "clearly stolen" about the information. It's only "clearly stolen" to persons wanting it to be "clearly stolen". Trump's staff should be evidence enough that inside information is leaked by supposedly trusted employees, and this was Kavanaugh's impression from the beginning.

The person that actually showed Kavanaugh said that he never told him it was stolen. Besides, Kavanaugh didn't even review all of the documents but only portions of it.

You're definitely jumping to conclusions here.

The material would have been the property of a Democratic party Senator, even if it was just a draft from a low level staff member.  A leak would have been prosecutable both civilly and criminally.
Leaks out of the Trump administration are also prosecutable but they are a bit different.  They are generally spoken words, not written, and they generally are talking about the President's words behind closed doors, not his political plans.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 11-03-2018, 12:52 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 11-03-2018, 07:53 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 11-03-2018, 09:55 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 11-03-2018, 11:41 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by Bchbunnie4 - 11-03-2018, 10:20 AM
RE: Trump to rewrite Constitution with executive order - by mikesez - 12-07-2018, 11:36 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!