(12-30-2018, 01:56 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(12-30-2018, 12:47 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: I said I would TRY him at WR, IF I put Jackson on the roster. Trying him there, means you would do it to see if he could play WR. If he couldn't you cut him.

Ok, why would you even have Lamar on your roster over receivers who have been playing there for years?

---

(12-30-2018, 01:17 AM)surfon Wrote: Why did this turn into Jackson vs Allen.  Back to the topic.

Flgators got defensive when I said I didn't think Lock was good and brogfht up Lamar (the 2nd best rookie QB this year by far )

I wouldn't. That's why I said IF I had him on my roster. I think I established a few posts ago that I don't want Jackson, period. I certainly wouldn't want him as a QB. I've said over and over I HATE running QB's. I'm old school. I believe QB's are there to throw and if you're not good at the main thing I want you to do, (pass the ball,) I want nothing to do with you. I could care less what kind of runner he is. I have RB's for that. IF I had Jackson on my roster, it would be in the preseason, to give him a chance to show he can be a WR. If he can't, I cut him. Simple as that.

---