(01-03-2019, 06:56 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(01-03-2019, 05:50 PM)JackCity Wrote: Play calling, who we had at QB, team chemistry, player regression. These are things that stemmed from poor performance at front office and coaching level.  

No need to blow it up at all, we have talent. Just a lot further away from competing now. I don't have any faith that the people in charge know how to evaluate QBs so it makes me fairly skeptical that the issue can be solved in the next 2 years.

---

Caldwell doesn't make the final decisions about player acquisition and/or release and he doesn't get to decide on Bortles or Fournette. I'm sure he has lots of input on both, but if Tom says no they don't happen.  

Coughlin is not playing the role of what most teams owners do. He's much more involved than that.

Believe what you want.  Good leadership doesn't work that way.

Regarding the part in bold, are you certain about that?  Any proof?  Because if that's the case, then Coughlin is the one not being a leader.

A good leader allows those appointed or in a position lower than him the freedom and flexibility to make their own decisions and he backs them.  Coughlin is ultimately responsible, but he's not going to micro-manage the people that work for him.

+1

Exactly, a good manager doesn't fire everyone every time things go awry.  A good manager gets his management team together, collects as much data as possible, evaluates the situation, coaches his subordinates on how to achieve the desired results and sends them on their way.  Now should the same issue rise again then he/she may need to demote or let people go.

---