(01-22-2019, 04:16 PM)rpr52121 Wrote:

(01-22-2019, 12:34 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: What's the point of that though?  Didn't we just play 60 minutes and have a tie?  Now we do 1 more possession each to then FINALLY get to sudden death?  Doesn't the team that wins the toss still have the advantage?  So we've accomplished nothing but to extend the game unnecessarily.

The previous format from years ago had the cheap scenario of win the toss and just get a short drive and get into field goal range to win and go home.  That format heavily favored the team that won the toss.  The current format avoids that and actually gives some advantages to the team that loses the toss.  For instance, if they hold their opponent to 3 they can then decide on a 4th down situation in field goal range to either tie it up and give the ball back to their opponent who now only needs another field goal or just go for the win and go for it on 4th down.  Having that information and that opportunity is an advantage.  I'd still take the ball if I won the toss, but at least not everything rides on the toss like before.  Also, not all overtime games are necessarily taking up an entire extra quarter to complete like what you're proposing above would often produce.  The current format is as fair as a sudden death overtime as we're likely to see.  I just don't see the point of having 1 more possession each of non-sudden death before getting to sudden death, especially in a climate of player safety being the reason for a lot of changes to the game.  Defense needs to play a part in this.

I guess I could see 1 possession each if you were forced to go for 2 in overtime as chances are if both teams score a TD one of them isn't going to get the 2 pt conversion, but I still don't like that format as much as the current one because with the current format, the coin flip winning team can make it a sudden death situation right from the get go by driving down and scoring a TD.  It's as simple as the defense of the losing team didn't do its part in that scenario.  These non-sudden death scenarios to get to sudden death after just playing 60 minutes of one of the most physically demanding sports on the planet just don't make a lot of sense to me.

I think you misunderstood what most of us are saying. Most of us are talking about the playoffs only. I for one think they should just go back to no overtimes for regular season games, but they will never do that.

Also, we are trying to make sure both teams get the ball on offense given the NFL has become an "offense-oriented league" where the best offense dictate things. Right now the first possession of OT is not sudden death unless it ends in a TD. 1 more possession is not going to be crazy.

Plus this year was really weird with multiple playoff OT games. Most years, there is not even 1 playoff game with OT.  So we are talking maybe 1 or 2 more possessions for a 2-4 teams every year to determine in route for a Super Bowl. I'm pretty players would be okay with that.

This is where I am. In the playoffs, its too unfair to see a season go because of a coin toss. Like you say, its an O friendly league now. I think Mahomes would have scored had the coin toss gone the other way. You have to be able to touch the ball in OT, I don't really care if that means some garbage on Fox gets shown later, its a football game, I want to see one team Beat the other, no matter how long it takes. That's competition.

But then I think football is a team game, your D is just as valuable as your O and has the same chances to make plays and do what they are paid millions to do.

---