(02-01-2019, 11:42 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(02-01-2019, 11:37 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Are you saying Teddy wasnt your guy or that you didnt miss on him?

I'm asking where I died on a hill for Teddy

Also, goodjob ignoring you completely missed on the rookie contract question and you didn't answer why you don't think a starting QB on a rookie deal is a massive advantage. Looks like we have another debate fail for you

Where did I say this lol? I just told you yesterday who wouldnt want a younger and cheaper QB if both were equal.  Did you already forget that conversation?  Of course QB on a rookie deal is an advantage if he is really good, but the odds of finding that SB winning QB arent good at all. 

 I feel our team is too close to risk trying to hit on that rookie if we can get a proven SB MVP winning QB like Foles.  The defense is there, I think our running game will be back with our healthy oline, and I feel we can get Foles more weapons early in the draft.  If we go with a rookie thats fine but I think our odds of winning a title are much higher the next couple years if we go with the proven Foles

---

(02-01-2019, 11:42 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(02-01-2019, 11:37 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Are you saying Teddy wasnt your guy or that you didnt miss on him?

I'm asking where I died on a hill for Teddy

Also, goodjob ignoring you completely missed on the rookie contract question and you didn't answer why you don't think a starting QB on a rookie deal is a massive advantage. Looks like we have another debate fail for you

Where did I die on a hill for any QB?  There are usually a couple QBs I'd be ok with in every draft

---