You keep beating the same drum.

1.) Its somewhat inefficient to represent the political spectrum as purely linear. There are multiple dimendions and axis that lend to a more 3d structure.

2.) I already pointed out that national socialism is not the same as international communism. Mussolini made that distinction as he realized the mobilizing force of a nation was stronger than that of disembodied class identification.

3.) The fundamental organizing tenant of fascism is "everything inside the state, and nothing outside of it." This gave the state universal power, as a representative of the COLLECTIVE WILL, to control every aspect of human life. Also it followed that the individual didn't matter in the context of the public interest and thus there was no commitment to individual rights. This has nothing to do with classical liberalism (what conservatives would be termed on the continent) or constitutional republicanism.

So again, we are not asserting that national socialism is the same destination as international communism. We are pointing out, quite clearly, that fascist state theory is, plainly, an irritation of statism.

---