Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Garafolo says Mutual interest between Nick Foles and Jaguars

#16

(02-13-2019, 08:24 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:
(02-13-2019, 08:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: a.   He's not technically a free agent till March 13th.

b.  the eagles have till march 5th to tag him   -  so yes, they can potentially trade him after tagging him if there are multiple teams after him

A. He opted out of his contract
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles has told the team he is voiding his option for the 2019 season, according to ESPN. ... Later, Foles reportedly told Philadelphia he would void that option, which means he must pay the Eagles his $2 million signing bonus from 2018 to opt out.

B. They can tag and try to trade him but it violates the CBA to tag to trade

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20...e-the-cba/

Foles and his agents should challenge the franchise tag, if it’s applied. Article 4, Section 8, subsection (b) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement states as follows: “A Club extending a Required Tender must, for so long as that Tender is extended, have a good faith intention to employ the player receiving the Tender at the Tender compensation level during the upcoming season.” If the Eagles would simply be tagging Foles to trade him, Foles should invoke this provision and fight the tag, via an expedited grievance that would be resolved before the start of free agency.

You're just saying the exact same thing I said, only you think you're saying something different. 

The contract extension he opted out of doesn't begin until March 13th, so he's still under contract, still taggable, and at that point still tradable. 

Could he go to court over the tag/trade scenario?  Sure, he could.  Doesn't mean he'll win anything.  

Questions for you:

Do you want Foles?

If you do - Would you rather pay a third round pick plus a one year salary, or sign him to a FA deal worth 50 million more?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mutual interest between Nick Foles and Jaguars - by NYC4jags - 02-13-2019, 08:32 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!