(02-18-2019, 04:23 PM)Jags Wrote: I don’t use the negative one.  Even if someone pisses me off.  I think it’s childish.  I’ve used it maybe once.  But here what I really don’t understand.  Someone gave me a ‘neutral”. Really?     What’s the point in that?    To say” I really have no opinion on your post either way”.  I have only gotten a few negatives.  2 of which by the same poster and one was a joke I made about the jags that apparently he didn’t think was funny.  Not that I’m keeping track.

(02-18-2019, 04:23 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:

(02-18-2019, 02:11 PM)mikesez Wrote: Some of you are missing the point of this thread.
It's mainly about the fact that no one agrees what the reputation button is for.  Should we all agree on what its proper use is or should the button go away?
Some of you have answered that question, and that's good.
But the thread is not about me.  To the extent that it's about any particular poster, it's about pirkster.
The one who started this.
The one who came on this thread and lied.  
We should probably just get rid of reputation ratings altogether, but, if they are going to stay, can we all just go and downvote pirkster for his lies, at least on this thread?

1. The rep button is whatever each user wants it to be used for. It’s not that hard, or that big of a deal.

2. Call out threads are against the rules and are warning worthy, and so are call out signatures.  

3. Dear God, let it go already! You are a grown [BLEEP] man whining about a damn reputation button that means nothing! Let that sink in for a minute if it hasn’t dawned on you already.

4. Seriously...let it go.