Quote: 

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="PAjagsfan" data-cid="119013" data-time="1390673969">
<div>
If your first round pick is going to sit on the bench he probably wasn't BAP, so your point is invalid. Suppose a QB is BAP when the Broncos are on the clock in round 1?
  Do you think he' going to win the job over Manning?  Likewise Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, etc.?
  The point is not invalid simply because you can't understand it!
You don't draft backup QBs in the first round, OK, here's the what all the talking head BAP idiots aren't bright enough to understand; if you automatically  take BAP, you don't even get to choose what position you're picking, that choice is made for you by virtue of earlier teams selections. 
but if you narrow your focus on O-Line, If your QB is spending a lot of time on the ground, O-line is a good place to focus on
you're going to miss out on better players just to fill a need.  LOL, they're called needs for a reason!  You don't need better players......you need players who make the team better.  I'm sorry if you're not able to understand the difference.

 

</div>
</blockquote>
 

The last time Manning's team was in that situation they... drafted the QB and released Manning. A QB won't be BAP when the Broncos are on the clock in the first round because there won't be anyone QB's rated that high, because none of the QB's in the draft class are at that level to compete with Manning. You have no idea how well I understand it.

 

If you grade a QB as a backup, you are not giving him a first round grade; therefore, a backup QB isn't going to be BAP in the first round.

 

 

Talent makes the team better. The only need is better talent.

---