(03-05-2019, 01:11 AM)rpr52121 Wrote: If anything, I would try to trade down if Haskins fell to the Jags pick. I don't get why everyone is treating Haskins and Murray like the second coming of Andrew Luck? There will be good QB prospects in future drafts. If they Jags need CHEAP good players at other positions of need. The draft is where you get those players.

(03-04-2019, 04:10 PM)p_rushing Wrote: If he is a franchise QB on your board, then yes. If you have Foles for 2-3 years, then you need another QB ready to replace him. If Foles is there for 3-4 years, then they could wait and pick a QB later in the draft. They need to get into a habit of drafting a QB every 2 years anyways. You always need to be able to trade them if you don't need them and they have high value.

People always put out this statement. If this pick is round 4 or later, then it makes some sense but even then only 3-4 years. But picks in the first 3 rounds are expected to be starters. You cannot have a consistent winning team in the salary cap era using up those pick by continually drafting QB's. No team will hit on enough QB's. Eventually the return on trades will never make up for the value of the picks you used to select all the QB's.

Generally it makes sense for 3rd round or later. With Foles though, Foles would probably be the one going in 3-4 years.

I definitely don't want them using top 2 round picks on a QB unless they need to find a starter. They should be drafted one though every few years so they have options. The rate of finding good QBs is low, so increase the odds and pick more of them.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

---