Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson

NCJag
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 35

#15

03-08-2019, 10:01 AM

(03-08-2019, 04:17 AM)rpr52121 Wrote: Nearly every breaking story Rappaport has come up with this week has been walked back. I would hold on before jumping down this rabbit hole.

True. This time of year, teams will tend to listen to calls for ANYONE, save franchise faces. Unless a deal blows them out of the water (3rd and Gipson for Rosen???) Right now, Antoine Bethea is the starting free safety in AZ but he will be 35 this year and has a cap hit of almost 7 mil. I dunno.......if they feel he would fit the scheme of P. Peterson, Amerson, Budda Baker and Gipson? But then again, they also claimed D.J. Swearinger from Wash in December.....but that dude is a headcase. All I know is, i'm glad im not in charge of making decisions....

“Motivation alone is not enough. If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

Messages In This Thread

Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by JagJohn - 03-06-2019, 12:17 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by BlueEyedJag - 03-06-2019, 12:38 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by JagJohn - 03-06-2019, 12:47 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by Caldrac - 03-06-2019, 12:43 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by TheO-LineMatters - 03-06-2019, 01:15 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by TheDogCatcher - 03-06-2019, 09:26 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by Jagsfan32277 - 03-06-2019, 09:31 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by Steelers Beaches - 03-07-2019, 07:39 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by JagJohn - 03-07-2019, 08:32 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by JagswinJagswin - 03-07-2019, 09:54 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by NYC4jags - 03-07-2019, 09:56 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by TheO-LineMatters - 03-07-2019, 11:13 PM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by flsprtsgod - 03-08-2019, 02:11 AM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by rpr52121 - 03-08-2019, 04:17 AM

RE: Considering the depth of the FA safety market it probably makes sense to cut Gipson - by NCJag - 03-08-2019, 10:01 AM

Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.