(04-18-2019, 03:40 PM)TJBender Wrote:

(04-18-2019, 03:17 PM)B2hibry Wrote: I get what you are saying but now you enter an interpretation issue and I blame Mueller for that. Was there intent? Did an action occur? Did the action obstruct a process? It becomes dangerous from a crime perspective. In any case, the bread crumb report was expected and planned for by the Dems. This will just carry on until elections and still nothing will come of it.

-Arrest that guy because he looks like a rapist and talks like a rapist.
-Arrest that dude because he was going to drive drunk last night but didn't actually.

This is why I need to find time to sit down and read the thing, at least the sections that both sides have latched onto. In my mind, telling someone to take an action that would obstruct an investigation is the same as obstructing justice, whether that person carries out your request or not. Is that really what the report says, and if so, what corroboration is there for it? A thinly-veiled suggestion that the President directed others to obstruct justice in an investigation of himself is a heavy hammer to drop without corroboration from multiple people who saw it happen.