(04-27-2019, 09:12 AM)dennisp3 Wrote:

(04-27-2019, 12:00 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: They clearly believed they weren't the only team onto him otherwise they wouldn't have burned a late 3rd on him.  Could they be wrong about that? Sure, but they made a decision with the info they had.  Let the guy take an NFL snap at least before crucifying the FO.  The truth is no one has access to all the teams boards which means you can't possibly know whether or not several teams at the top of the 4th might've been interested in him.

What's amazing is no one knew anything about him and now we have to listen to uninformed want a be GM's tell us why the pick was so bad and how we wasted it on a player they know nothing about. I for one will go with the front office and the scouts that evaluated him putting in many hours deciding his value.
<M

Did you feel that way with Tanner Lee?  I thought he was a terrible pick.  I got a bunch of people last year saying "the Jaguars front office has professional scouts and know what they are doing..blah..blah..blah...".  Guess what?  He got cut.  I was right.  Those professionals in the front office were wrong.  That's just from last year.  There's plenty of examples from the past as well.  

That being said, I'll be the first to admit that I can be wrong.  In this case, I hope I am wrong.  However, this board is here to express our opinions.  My opinion is that this pick sucks.  If you are just going to blindly like every pick the Jaguars make, then there's no point in these message boards.

---