(05-15-2019, 02:19 PM)TJBender Wrote:

(05-15-2019, 01:54 PM)jj82284 Wrote: Neither is an article II personell decision.

How many times have we been through this? If someone is investigating you and you call someone else and order them to fire the person investigating you, what are you doing to that investigation?

How many times have we been through this?  The AG works for the president, the only nationally elected official in our system of government.  If the president walked in & told sessions to fire Mueller that is within his prerogative under article II of the constitution.  

Moreover ROBERT MUELLER HAD DISQUALIFYING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST!  How many more times are we going to have to point this out?

---

(05-15-2019, 02:59 PM)TJBender Wrote:

(05-15-2019, 02:49 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: When in doubt, ask yourself the question of if this investigation would have happened had Hillary won. The answer to that question lets you know how important it was.

I disagree. Hillary Clinton wasn't investigated for her mishandling of government emails (among other things that will never be proven), but she should have been. If there's credible evidence of someone working with a foreign power to manipulate US election results, I would expect them to be investigated whether they win the election, whether they lose miserably or whether they're not involved in the election at all. Jeff Sessions saw enough merit to it to keep it alive, and to recuse himself from the proceedings. What does that say about how much merit it had?

U mean like paying Russian officials to provide false Intel to the DOJ?  Like that?

---