(05-24-2019, 10:43 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Holy cow. The Boston Herald unloaded on Elizabeth Warren.


"When Donald Trump is involved in any brushes with bankruptcy, it just proves what a con man he is, a deadbeat and a scam artist, using his white privilege and toxic masculinity to rip off victims of the evil capitalist system.

But now that it turns out the fake Indian, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, may have made millions as a lawyer in assorted corporate, Trump-like bankruptcies, somehow it’s become a wonderful, positive experience.
“Bankruptcy law is about coming up with the fairest outcome possible in a difficult system,” the fake Indian’s campaign gushed Wednesday, “and trying to help individuals and businesses get a fresh start.”
Translation: there are two kinds of bankruptcies, Republican bankruptcies (bad), and Democrat bankruptcies (good).

We’re heading into the long first weekend of summer, so the Warren campaign decided it was time for one more document dump about yet another dodgy part of Fauxcohontas’ career — at least in the sense that she now claims to be a woke Social Justice Warrior fighting The Man.
Turns out that in reality, The Man was paying Lieawatha big wampum — on her website, she listed 56 cases she was involved in as the first “woman of color” professor at Harvard Law School, and before that at UPenn.

Chief Spreading Bull was grabbing as much as $675 an hour, which puts her on the jagged (or is it ragged?) edge of the 1 percent. This was on top of the $350,000 Harvard paid her every year for teaching one course, plus of course the interest-free loan to buy her $2-million teepee in Cambridge..."

See, this is the problem with running rich white people in the Democratic Party right now. How can they consistently call themselves the party of the people when they're running white, privileged millionaires like Warren (who is white), Sanders and Biden, even a billionaire in Hillary Clinton? The type of people that the Democratic Party are after are already figuring that out, and it's going to be a disaster for them in 2020 if they wind up split between a "man of the people" and an "establishment: candidate, like what happened in 2016.

Also, I believe the proper, respectful term is "wigwam".

---