The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mueller Investigation Complete
|
(05-30-2019, 11:23 AM)Adam2012 Wrote:(05-30-2019, 10:54 AM)Last42min Wrote: Why can't you just see it for what it is? There wasn't evidence to convict Trump for any criminal wrongdoing, but there are enough question marks for an impeachment, if the House was inclined to do so. This much was clear from his testimony yesterday. Once Mueller examined the evidence, he didn't have a strong enough claim for a criminal charge. So, instead of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, he included those incidents which he thought would legitimize impeachment proceedings. Hillary Clinton helped him get elected. How many times do we need to go over this? Mueller didn't do his job. It's over. Time to move on and enjoy the greatest economic times in the history of our country. FYI, the economy grew at 3% in 2019 Q1. You mad? |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.