(08-12-2019, 01:28 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(08-12-2019, 12:55 PM)B2hibry Wrote: That is a narrow point of view and naive. Kind of funny (ironic) how that is the same thought process with each and every "gun control" measure for each an every emotional reaction to highly publicized shooting. Not every mass shooting, just the ones that meet an agenda.

Not that type of gun, this one. Not that magazine type, this one. Not that bullet type, this one. Rinse and repeat until there is precedence to ban everything. And Yes, staying true to the 2nd Amendment you have the right to access for that type of weaponery.

You think that because of the 2nd Amendment, there is no limit on what type of arms you are allowed to own?

Trying to apply "the no limit" standard is a cop-out when there is no further debate to be had. As the most abundant and available firearm in the U.S., it is not considered unusual or special in ownership, operation, and capabilities. It is the musket of modern times. As far as a limitation to the type of arms, I believe there should be no limitation to any Constitutional Amendment unless it is a direct infringement on an individuals rights. The simple ownership of any type of firearm does not infringe on anyone's rights. Using the tool in a manner that does infringe on a right is already covered by current laws.

---