Foles admittedly is something of an unknown here having only had real success with Philly. It's ok to say that and have some concerns about whether he can duplicate that success.

But arguing that he's not "Super Bowl quality" after leading the Eagles to their first title, and he did Lead them, whether he got on a hot streak or got lucky, or whatever - it's kind of like arguing that water isn't wet.
And nobody gets to and wins a Super Bowl without some luck. Unless maybe if you're the Patriots

---