(10-25-2019, 06:05 PM)p_rushing Wrote:

(10-25-2019, 05:34 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: I thought Ramsey said what the "disrespect" was - that Tom and/or DaveC "stood over" Ramsey during the meeting.

(10-25-2019, 05:55 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: You don't know what reason he had for doing what he did. He hasn't said what he told Ramsey, and Ramsey, despite telling his side of it, hasn't even so much as implied what was said to him. For all we know, Coughlin could've been perfectly respectful, and Ramsey is just using this situation to gain support from teammates instead of outright demanding a trade. You seem to make a lot of assumptions about the situation, but we don't know what was said to Ramsey or if it was out-of-bounds.

The fact that Ramsey hasn't mentioned what was said shows that nothing out of bounds was said. Ramsey was fine lying about his back, but he won't mention what was said. If TC said something that wasn't good and crossed a line, Ramsey would have made it known so he would be on the right side and would have a grievance filed against the team. The fact that nothing has come out means Ramsey knows there were 3 people in the room to provide witnesses and potentially they even recorded it to shut him down.

Ramsey has no problems talking and lying about other things, so why won't he say what was said?

Your logic makes zero sense. If Ramsey was so set on lying why wouldn't he just make up what they said? The front office isn't gonna say anything more than they already have. 

Also he's hardly going to file a grievance while trying to get to another team, that just causes unnecessary PR for the new team and his own brand.

---