I don't disagree that Florida will someday be underwater. It's extremely plausible. I don't know if it'll be 50 years from now or 5,000 years from now. But it can certainly happen. But a lot of the data we were spoon fed as kids simply hasn't added up. I still think people on both sides of the argument should reach mutual levels of agreement here though.

Cleaner energy is ultimately better for the planet. It's a pain in the [BLEEP] to pull oil out of the Earth. Fracking is also an issue. We've seen how terrible it can be in certain cities here. I also look at it as a potential economic boon someday for our country. How many great cities have fallen apart thanks to key industries going underwater financially?

It's just good for business. Even Shell or other Oil companies are trying to advertise this fact to the public. It's a step in the right direction. The data DOES need to add up though. Too much division in that field and it causes these very rifts we're having here alone in this thread. It's a bit of a bummer.

---