(11-06-2019, 03:02 AM)Eric1 Wrote:

(11-06-2019, 01:55 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: Like it or not, that is our only 2 options. Neither is great, but it's still better than what we've had in the last several years.

Which is why you go with the 23 year old rookie with upside/promise, over the average at best, injury prone, stop gap QB who has already peaked.

But that's fine, lets see what Foles can do.. He better be at least a top 10 QB+ and help us win out, or else...

We just watched a 6th round rookie QB with zero 1st team reps going into the season, lead us to a 4-4 record as the starter. If Foles is suppose to be so good, his record as the starter for this team should look far better than .500 going forward. Basically, like I already said, we better win out the rest of this season if Foles is the QB.

Otherwise, what's the point of changing QBs if Foles is going to just produce the same level of production, or worse than a 6th round rookie..

This coaching staff/front office basically backed themselves into a corner with making Foles the starter now. It's literally win now, or else you gotta go. No more excuses.. They think Foles gives them the best chance to win, so it better happen.

This is a little intense lol look before the season started nobody even knew who minshew was. They were confident enough in Foles to pay him what they did. He got hurt, they went 4-4 with minshew. A fine result in anyones mind between week 1 and 2. You need to realistically go 6-1 to have a shot at wildcard. And it is just that, a shot. Not a great one but until there is no chance, you have to throw Foles out there and see if he makes this team better.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

---