(11-19-2019, 10:57 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-19-2019, 09:50 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: If she understands anything about economics, then she is a very cynical demagogue.  If not, she's an ignoramus.  One or the other.  I'm not sure which.

I'd hesitate to call a Harvard law professor an ignoramus.
I also suspect she is completely sincere, unlike many others.
I explain her advocating this wealth tax more as, she "knows so much that isn't so."

I wouldn't. Her studies were incredibly poorly done before Harvard and only slightly better while there. She wouldn't have been there except she listed herself as a minority in the Association of American law professors directory. Her CV was not Harvard level and research into bankruptcy was political thinktank level. She would list any bankruptcy that included any medical debt as being caused by medical debt for the first study and then raised the bar to $1000 of medical debt for the second.

I am thouroughly unimpressed with Warren and do not think she is honest.

---