(12-05-2019, 10:37 AM)Kane Wrote:

(12-03-2019, 06:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The Journal of Psychiatry, Clinical Toxicology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, The American Journal on Addictions, The Journal of Pediatric Neurology, Journal of Psychedelic Drugs, The Royal College of Sweden, The Canadian Psychiatric Association, Mayo Clinical Proceedings, and Journal of Forensic Science to name a few. 

Stupid idiot judgemental [BLEEP] hats that they are, clearly dont know what they are talking about like a bunch of users do. 

You didn't provide any links to studies just named a bunch of sources of information many of which would be very biased considering what the medical community has to lose if THC and CBD were to replace many harmful Rx drugs.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...rs-science

Here's a nice article written by a professor of psychology and neuroscience  basically dismissing recent claims to what you assert...
correlation is not causation.

"bunch of users" what a dolt.
Bet your addicted to something as a user of sugar, caffeine, alcohol, television... internet... etc etc.

All of which (especially your obsession with talking to strangers thru a computer screen) is much more a mental disease than anything THC could bring you.

Yes, yes, I know. Science and whatnot... 

Do you stop to consider how your rapid and urgent defense of your behavior makes you seem to be an addict? As I said above, I've used pretty much anything you can think of, and I'm not saying you can't do it if you want. I don't think vice of any type should be a crime.  What I do know is that the behavior has inherent risks that should be considered, not dismissed, especially if we intend to legalize it.

---