The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We should switch to 3-4
|
(12-30-2019, 12:13 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Nah, we talk about this every few years and I'm not a fan of the 34. It's an assumption that the linebackers can suddenly just switch to a different scheme and our D-linemen, 93 and 99 in particular, are substantially more effective in 43 than they were in the 34. 93 and 99 are not going to be here long term. 41 and 91 (hopefully) are going to be here long term. I'm thinking about the best use of 41 and 91. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.