(12-30-2019, 12:53 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(12-30-2019, 12:46 PM)iHaunting Raven Wrote: Yeah no. 

We need O-lineman, TE, CB, S, RB... It'd be stupid to make the switch, especially with Marrone.

It's not stupid if it benefits the team. They need to figure something out on defense after the lapses they had.

You're asking for offensive lineman and tight ends in a class that features more prominent defenders on opening night.

This is how you end up missing out on players like Allen because you needed a tight end like Hockenson.

No thanks. If switching to a 3 - 4 means getting more out of Allen [Who showed outstanding pass coverage abilities at Kentucky], Jack playing inside with a promising prospect like Simmons who is an athlete like him but actual experience at LB / S and then you have Delpit who has range and can effect the run and pass?

You take them. You don't reach for a lineman. You don't reach for a corner. You don't reach for a tight end. That's stupid. This team has enough holes as it already is. You really can't go wrong in round one. Especially on the defensive side of the football.

Now. With that said. If a guy like Andrew Thomas slips to #9. Take him. He's a franchise caliber LT. If Okudah is there at cornerback? Maybe take him over Simmons or Delpit. Either way. Tons of needs to address.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I never said reach for needs, I was in favor of drafting Allen. 

You won't see massive change in year 1, we could actually see an even worse defense. Marrone will leave sooner of later, are we gonna lose out on a great HC candidate if he doesn't wanna have a 3-4 defense? Who is gonna be the DC? What if one of the D-lineman goes down? We just don't have enough players to run it.

It would be stupid, it won't help the team any time soon.

BTW pretty much no one drafts BAP, even if they say so. Allen was a rare BAP because he was such a great player who dropped, that's when you strictly apply BAP. Otherwise, most teams draft with a combination of BAP/need.

---