Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it)

iapetus
Journeyman
Posts: 1,002
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 35

#34

01-01-2020, 06:14 AM

(12-31-2019, 06:44 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(12-31-2019, 05:05 PM)TJBender Wrote: The team has four first-round picks over the next two years. Any GM candidate worth a damn would wet his pants for that setup.

This can't be said enough.

What rookie GM wouldn't want 4 picks in the first 2 years? Throw in a promising young QB, and you probably get your choice of candidates.

Add the horrible cap situation and the warnings not to play here from the NFLPA and things balance out a bit more.

Messages In This Thread

Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagJohn - 12-31-2019, 05:03 PM

RE: What is the plan moving forward? - by TJBender - 12-31-2019, 05:05 PM

What is the plan moving forward? - by I am Yoda - 12-31-2019, 05:07 PM

RE: What is the plan moving forward? - by JagJohn - 12-31-2019, 05:58 PM

RE: What is the plan moving forward? - by I am Yoda - 12-31-2019, 06:36 PM

RE: What is the plan moving forward? - by JagJohn - 12-31-2019, 06:40 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagFan81 - 12-31-2019, 05:23 PM

Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Caldrac - 12-31-2019, 05:29 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by jj82284 - 01-01-2020, 01:16 AM

Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Caldrac - 12-31-2019, 05:38 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Rockman1966 - 12-31-2019, 05:47 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Upper - 12-31-2019, 06:05 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagJohn - 12-31-2019, 06:14 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Newton - 12-31-2019, 06:13 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by navyjagfan - 12-31-2019, 06:18 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by flgatorsandjags - 12-31-2019, 06:33 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by snowwolf776 - 12-31-2019, 06:36 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by RealJagsFan - 12-31-2019, 06:40 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagNGeorgia - 12-31-2019, 06:44 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by iapetus - 01-01-2020, 06:14 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by The Real Marty - 01-01-2020, 07:30 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by The Real Marty - 12-31-2019, 06:57 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagJohn - 12-31-2019, 07:52 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by HandsomeRob86 - 12-31-2019, 11:24 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by MoJagFan - 12-31-2019, 07:42 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by MoJagFan - 12-31-2019, 08:00 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by I am Yoda - 01-01-2020, 01:09 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JaG4LyFe - 12-31-2019, 08:46 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by TJBender - 01-01-2020, 03:03 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Nikowho - 12-31-2019, 08:51 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Caldrac - 12-31-2019, 08:59 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by KodiakJag - 12-31-2019, 09:44 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by IndyJagsFan - 12-31-2019, 10:44 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Sneakers - 01-01-2020, 01:04 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Caldrac - 01-01-2020, 02:32 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by captivating - 01-01-2020, 06:06 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by RicoTx - 01-01-2020, 07:42 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by MarleyJag - 01-01-2020, 08:10 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by homebiscuit - 01-01-2020, 09:58 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by MarleyJag - 01-01-2020, 10:06 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by navyjagfan - 01-01-2020, 11:33 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by PF* - 01-01-2020, 09:48 AM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by JagJohn - 01-01-2020, 03:22 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by pirkster - 01-01-2020, 03:28 PM

RE: Explaining Shad's decision... (but not agreeing with it) - by Caldrac - 01-01-2020, 04:18 PM

Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.