The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Disturbing chips in the armor
|
(01-11-2020, 12:48 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:(01-11-2020, 12:11 PM)mikesez Wrote: I haven't read the war powers act lately, but I'm pretty sure the Persian dude was not traveling in an armored vehicle, nor was he traveling with any heavy weapons. So while he may have been planning an attack, he was not an obvious threat at that moment. That doesn't mean it was wrong to kill him. But a better explanation of why it was important to kill him at exactly that moment is owed. Beware, incoming 8,000 word dissertation on the word "response." “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.