(01-20-2020, 12:18 PM)jj82284 Wrote:

(01-20-2020, 11:32 AM)mikesez Wrote: You're conflating the pro-choice movement that began in the mid 1960s in the US with the eugenics that came before and the cancel culture that came after.  These are three separate phenomena.  While you could certainly find a person that advocates for all three, you could just as easily find someone who only advocates for one or two of them.  Importantly, all three of these phenomena are working within a framework of non-violent electoral politics, so none of them can be a meaningful analogue to the brownshirts.

Abortion is nonviolent?  Ok.  Antifa is nonviolent...  ok.  

And again, ur either lying or dont understand linear progression. Pp was founded on eugenic theory and its founder also advocated for compulsory government control of all reproductive activity in the country (a code for babies).  The Don drapers of the world marketed voluntary extermination as pro CHOICE.  that choice is the mass stripping of human rights from a certain class of persons.  I already included the basic example.  If congress passes a law tomorrow legalizing rape centers and issues licenses to rape practitioners the fact that it was democratic or non violent at the time does not negate the fact that its sanctioning a crime against humanity.

I oppose abortion. I don't think women have a right to kill a baby just because the baby happens to be in her body at the time.  Many disagree, but clearly, you and I agree about this.  
But I also don't think that the government deciding that women do have a right to kill their fetuses at any time for any reason is analogous to the brownshirts marching through neighborhoods and picking fights on election day to prevent the other parties from turning out.

---