(02-25-2020, 08:27 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(02-25-2020, 07:27 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Trump shmoozed the Clintons as a wealthy donor, like many other billionaires, to gain political favor. It’s what they do.

In all the years of investigation that was commissioned by the dems against Trump since he’s been in office, not one scintilla of information was uncovered that showed Trump was acquainted with Epstein beyond the wealthy circles they ran in. 

Any attempt to equate Trump’s associations as a private citizens to the craven chicanery we’ve see from the left in the past 3 and a half years would be deeply flawed. But you go.

Trump himself said Epstein is so terrific guy and a lot of fun to be with.  In 2002 he said he'd known him for 15 years and their friendship started in 80s.

Multiple instances of Trump and Epstein hanging out , trumps contact and emergency contacts in Epstein's blackbook etc etc 

And it doesn't have to be one side of the other. Both are bad! Just funny how Trump fans think he's some kind of rebel inside the system vs just someone who was directly inside the most powerful system of all and spent lots of times around all the silent powerbrokers in American politics

Really? You want to pull the Epstein card? The guy who catered for years to the sexual whims of the husband of the Democrat candidate of President of the United States? (You know, the guy who was the subject of a painting inside Epstein’s love mansion.) The same party that then subverted their own government in a years long, and unsuccessful, retribution campaign? 

You’re flailing like an Adam Schiff air dancer. Any attempt to equate Trump’s pre-election anglings to the subterfuge we’ve witnessed since 2016 is preposterously laughable.

---