The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Time to forget “needs”?
|
(03-10-2020, 07:29 AM)PS9 Wrote:(03-10-2020, 06:54 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: One of the most clueless takes I've ever read. No shock it would be from that guy.So say that you are picking 9th and you have a below average secondary with a need at CB. You have a solid DL with no real big need. There is a DL sitting there who you have graded out as a top 5 player and a CB who is a top 10 player on your board. You’re taking the DL and continuing to have a hole at CB? If the defensive lineman is better than the cb then take the lineman or trade out of the pick. Never take Bryan Anger because you don't think you need Russell Wilson. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.