(03-10-2020, 07:29 AM)PS9 Wrote:

(03-10-2020, 06:54 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: One of the most clueless takes I've ever read. No shock it would be from that guy.

So say that you are picking 9th and you have a below average secondary with a need at CB. You have a solid DL with no real big need.  There is a DL sitting there who you have graded out as a top 5 player and a CB who is a top 10 player on your board. You’re taking the DL and continuing to have a hole at CB?

Yep
See: We don't need Roethlisberger, we have Leftwich. Etc.

With the turnover of rosters, guys like Yan wanting out, Taven Bryan being a "?" Smoot more of just a role player, a huge need at NT, Campbell age....
I mean why wouldn't we take the DL guy?

Sure we have Herndon and then nothing behind him at CB but I think the drop off on DL talent later in the draft is bigger than the drop off at CB in late 1st and 2nd rounds.

Also.... The rake analogy doesn't really fit with this.

The rake analogy is more like having a need at DL or CB and taking a RB at 9
See: Fournette top 5 instead of QB, TE, OL
Taven Bryan round 1 instead of QB, TE, OL
etc.... (Coughlin recently divorced btw)

---