(03-19-2020, 12:55 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(03-19-2020, 09:24 AM)Mikey Wrote: oh, no. Take one, and fill another hole with the other pick.

Not saying they are the same talent level or prospect, but it's the equivalent of Harvey/Groves as your first two picks.

However, if you are saying that Brown at 9, [mumblemumble] at 20, and Kinlaw is there at 42, by all means, that is FANTASTIC value and should be the pick.

You dont think DT and NT are both needs?  I really hope Bryan takes the next step this year but he is still a question mark

---

(03-19-2020, 11:32 AM)Upper Wrote: Worst case makes it sound bad, he's a good player he just won't be the best player available at 9. At least one of the OTs will be there and they are better while also filling a big need.

If Brown somehow falls to 9 he will be the BPA.  He is a top 5 player in this draft easily, I like some of the tackles but not sure i can say that about any of them.  If he falls to 9 it will be like Allen falling to us last year.

You set yourself up for failure there. It's highly unlikely that Kinlaw is BAP at 20, especially if the team does land Brown at 9. If Brown is that good, shouldn't Bryan do well? If Brown is that good, do you NEED to put Kinlaw there, or can you maybe get one of the next tier guys, and be just fine? That may allow you to plug a different hole, too.

They are both great players. There's a lot of great players in a draft, though, and I'm wary to leave other positions unaddressed when doubling up on one (interior line). I prefer to diversify the portfolio.

---