Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
More Context to the Ramsey trade

#81

(04-24-2020, 11:07 AM)Kane Wrote:
(04-24-2020, 10:49 AM)Bullseye Wrote: I give you credit for your response.  Though I disagree with many of your conclusions and some of the reasoning behind it, you at least approached your answer from a purely football perspective as opposed to letting personality dictate your response.  As for Henderson's deficiencies and your statement that he's being paid to cover, not tackle, I agree that is his primary purpose.  But you better believe if any dispute arises between he and the team, fans here will be the very first to use his lack of tackling prowess as a justification to rail against him.  Yan is an edge rusher.  He's was drafted to rush the passer.  He has been very good at it and now wants to be rewarded for it.  Before his holdout, the majority of the board wanted to re-sign him.  Now?  All anyone talks about in analyzing him as a football player is his run defense.  I'm excluding his twitter beef.  Everyone agrees he didn't handle that well.  But I'm talking specifically as a football player.

I think another thing lost on all of this is we have had two prominent players on our team get so pissed with the front office the differences became irreconcilable.

Does this concern ANY of you?!?

Fair point... but fans gonna fan. I mean, we're all doing it 24 hrs into the draft already right? lol
Yeah Yan catches a lot of flack for not being great against the run, even though he has drastically improved in that area. I was all in on pay Yan until he went full on Ramsey on Twitter.
And you're right, many people who are good with the Henderson pick probably will do a 180 if he isn't a great player, or pulls some drama in the media and they may use his lack of tackling as an excuse as why "they never liked him" 
But my point is... maybe his tackling isn't as bad as we think... I mean, Sanders wasn't a tackler either. 

Does any of the Ramsey/Yan stuff concern me? Nah, not really. Different strokes for different folks. We knew about Ramsey's personality day 1, Yannick's thing kind of developed.
If we start to see more of it, it would start to concern me. But for every one of those guys we had some stand up dudes like AJ and Calais. Men who knew how to go about the biz. These kids have entitlement and personality issues. That's on them, not on the team.
Did the team screw up when they probably could've locked them up sooner? Sure. But that ship has sailed and I'm not going to think about how they could screw it up with the next slew of draft picks.

As it relates to on the field, I think these two selections are good for the team. As it relates to the trade, I think we got some lemonade from a lemon and we're trying to make some more with another. Talent wise? These guys were awesome for our team. And you rarely replace a developed elite talent with another right away. Henderson won't be Ramsey right away, but he should be a legit #1 CB right away, which we desperately needed. K'Lavon might need some developing or he might surprise. But he adds a solid player to a position of need if/when Yan leaves.

As per the value of the trade, like I said, we gotta see what 2021 nets us before really coming to conclusions but I'll take 3 players being solid contributors/starters over 1 elite player. Because it takes a village my man. No team ever won the superbowl because of a loud mouth HoF CB alone.
So far from the Ramsey trade we got a pass rusher and two picks in 2021, one of which could be a high first rounder. Hell... that pick could turn out to be Trevor Lawrence, if you're a fan of his, I'd assume you'd take that trade off all by itself (Ramsey for a "franchise QB")

(Emphasis added)

As to the first point in bold, if he becomes Deion Sanders, I would be over the moon with the pick.  As it stands now I am a little more comfortable with the pick so,e 15 hours or so later.

As to the second point in bold, I agree that the true and complete measure of whether we capitalized on the Ramsey trade won't be determined until we see how Chaisson turns out and what ends up happening with those 2021 picks.  Now if that 2021 pick results in a franchise QB (and yes I like Lawrence), I would push Ramsey into oncoming traffic for those picks!   Laughing(just kidding folks).

But just looking solely at the Chaisson pick at this point, I just don't think we maximized the return with 1/3 of the picks we got for Ramsey.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Bullseye - 04-23-2020, 10:54 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Caldrac - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by rfc17 - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Dimson - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by nate - 04-24-2020, 01:09 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:05 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Jags239 - 04-24-2020, 12:00 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:07 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Firesky - 04-24-2020, 12:49 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:23 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:34 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:02 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 10:04 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by RicoTx - 04-24-2020, 11:01 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by RicoTx - 04-24-2020, 11:37 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 11:07 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Bullseye - 04-24-2020, 11:47 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by uthill - 04-24-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by jj82284 - 04-24-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 11:27 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by nate - 04-24-2020, 11:35 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by B2hibry - 04-24-2020, 05:46 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Jags - 04-24-2020, 06:35 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!