Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
More Context to the Ramsey trade


(04-24-2020, 01:26 PM)Bullseye Wrote:
(04-24-2020, 01:19 PM)anonymous2112 Wrote: Ramsey's contract is about to be a massive headache for the Rams, assuming they want to re-sign him after this season.  With Ramsey, I see 3 things at play:

A player becoming larger than the team with his constant "look at me" distractions.
A player with a looming franchise-busting contract demand.
A player who crossed a line that you just can't come back from (faking injury)

Sure, he's very, very good at his job, but then, so is Antonio Brown.  The trade was an absolute windfall for the Jags.  To your other point, we'll know in 2 years if we completely blew the number 20 pick.  While I know you're disappointed, lets see how the rest of the draft plays out.  They haven't picked anyone I had targeted yet either, but the run on cornerbacks sure put the #9 pick in perspective.  If we think Henderson's a cut above the guys that followed him, then he's worth #9.

Oh, I'm not giving up on the rest of this draft.  Still lots of talent available that can help this team.

But despite our windfall of picks, we won't likely be able to adequately fill every hole we have.

regardig Ramsey's contract demands, are teams better off never drafting Hall of Fame caliber players?

Not saying Ramsey is necessarily a Hall of Famer, but we can agree he was an All Pro and pro bowl caliber player at this early stage of his career.

But assume for argument's sake we had an immediate impact, hall of fame player on his rookie deal.

Re-signing him will invariably cost a ton.

Do we always avoid re-signing guys like that because they want to get paid according to their skills?!?

Should the Jaguars only draft good at best players to avoid the big contract?

Answering your three questions, let's use Boselli as an example:

1. It's always awesome to draft Hall-of-Fame caliber players, even if they wind up on someone else's team when they're done.  Ideally, you'd like for them to be completely spent by the time they're on another team.
2. Re-signing them to even record amounts of money is not just good business, but expected.  But you are not just paid for your skill set.  Character, work ethic, and durability factor in, too.  A guy like Boselli had it all until that one injury.  Ramsey seems to have a serious character flaw.  Too bad, would have loved for him to be the highest paid Jag, but he can't be.
3. No, draft great players.  If they hit all their marks, give them big contracts. 

If you draft 10 great guys and can't give them all contracts, then you have to make some serious business decisions about who to keep, who to trade, and who to let walk in free agency.  In other threads, you and other posters posited that the Jags are "purging the roster".  I contend that what Caldwell is doing is not only natural on a bad team, but on a good team as well.  Ketchman isn't right about everything, but one statement still resonates with me.

It's a game of replacement.

You're obviously not content with the replacement, and I think that's fine.  Ramsey, however, had to be replaced.  I'm not sure we did it this year, but we have an extra #1 next year.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Bullseye - 04-23-2020, 10:54 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Caldrac - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by rfc17 - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Dimson - 04-23-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by nate - 04-24-2020, 01:09 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:05 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Jags239 - 04-24-2020, 12:00 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:07 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Firesky - 04-24-2020, 12:49 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:23 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 12:34 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:02 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 10:04 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by RicoTx - 04-24-2020, 11:01 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by RicoTx - 04-24-2020, 11:37 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by anonymous2112 - 04-24-2020, 01:47 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Kane - 04-24-2020, 11:07 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by uthill - 04-24-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by jj82284 - 04-24-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by enigma - 04-24-2020, 11:27 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by nate - 04-24-2020, 11:35 AM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by B2hibry - 04-24-2020, 05:46 PM
RE: More Context to the Ramsey trade - by Jags - 04-24-2020, 06:35 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!