(05-11-2020, 11:21 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(05-11-2020, 11:15 AM)B2hibry Wrote: In the context of the entire situation with the information we have and Georgia law, yes it is deemed involuntary at best. The death results due to an act of recklessness or criminal negligence. There was no original intent for killing someone. Everyone seems to be glossing over the fact that Ahmaud ran towards two armed individuals. At that point, he can not claim self-defense. The individual with the shotgun did not point with intent at Ahmaud. The shotgun was fired after a brief scuffle and could be claimed and supported as self-defense. Although Ahmaud's original action can be deemed felony burglary by Georgia law, the situation did not need to result in someone's death. I've said it once and I'll say it again...Both parties escalated to a point it did not need to be. Remove one factor from either side and this "kid" is alive.

Black guy.

White guy with gun.

White guy with gun.

Another white guy filming it.

"C'mere boy, we need to talk ta you."

In [BLEEP] GEORGIA.

Yeah, you go on and believe whatever you like, the yokels had plenty of "original intent" the moment they decided they'd show that no good colored so and so what's what.

---

(05-11-2020, 11:19 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Man, so beyond your normal posts. Rona got you going to the deep end of the ignorant pool.

---

Show where I defended it? Because I'm not wanting to jump to a conclusion and play the stupid race game in the shallow end of the gene pool? Don't be a tool.

Keeping an open mind about those morons taking the law into their own hands when they absolutely did not have to is pretty much defending it. Anyone can see what they were doing and why it was the wrong thing to do.

Did they have to? No. Was it illegal? No. Now ask those same questions for Ahmaud. Having an objective viewpoint is not supporting either party.

---

(05-11-2020, 11:24 AM)Gabe Wrote:

(05-11-2020, 11:15 AM)B2hibry Wrote: In the context of the entire situation with the information we have and Georgia law, yes it is deemed involuntary at best. The death results due to an act of recklessness or criminal negligence. There was no original intent for killing someone. Everyone seems to be glossing over the fact that Ahmaud ran towards two armed individuals. At that point, he can not claim self-defense. The individual with the shotgun did not point with intent at Ahmaud. The shotgun was fired after a brief scuffle and could be claimed and supported as self-defense. Although Ahmaud's original action can be deemed felony burglary by Georgia law, the situation did not need to result in someone's death. I've said it once and I'll say it again...Both parties escalated to a point it did not need to be. Remove one factor from either side and this "kid" is alive.

While for some odd reason, you appear to be overstating it. 

They. Set. Up. An. Armed. Road. Block.

Because it's valid. Not a roadblock if your running towards it on a two way street.

---

(05-11-2020, 11:32 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(05-11-2020, 11:30 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Trying to fit in. Don't dish if you can't take it.

-Was this Ahmaud's neighborhood?
-Was that his house?
-Why run towards the pickup?
-Why fight to get the shotgun?

Take away any of the above and "kid" is alive. Why no blame on this "good boy" and just the white guys?

Lol and you’re not defending. Got it.

Apparently you don't "got it." It's okay. Just round up all the good ol' boys outside Atlanta with their truck guns. Damn crackers.

---