(05-11-2020, 01:27 PM)B2hibry Wrote:

(05-11-2020, 01:16 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: If he was not brandishing the shotgun the results might've been different, but if they'd stayed the hell out of it and let the Law deal with it then it certainly would've been different. Bottom line: they instigated the incident, they killed a man, and they should be charged and tried accordingly. And the rhetoric isn't useless when it certainly looks to be true.

Bottom Line: You are ignoring a whole set of facts in order to run with your narrative. It is indeed rhetoric at this point based on public information and regardless of your opinion. There is no law against brandishing a firearm. Even without the shotgun, as a retired investigator, I'm certain he has a law enforcement weapons permit. I'll ask you again, in hindsight does a concealed firearm change your point of view? You are right on one point, things could have been different...but as I've been saying since the beginning of this thread, both parties could have removed just one variable to avoid this whole situation. Pretty typical in most situations like this, but that variable is not racism. I am curious as to why we haven't heard about or seen a video of the police and paramedic response.

---

This is the type of stuff racial rhetoric gets you...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...ibute.html